[Tom Nichols]

Hi,

This was discussed at the December PIPLIVE Webinar and, as a result, PIPA has contacted the MHRA for an update from them on the problems raised. The MHRA has confirmed it will be coming back to us with a response shortly.

PIPA Committee

[Tom Nichols]

This question was discussed at the December PIPA Live webinar. The slides and recording will shortly be available at:

Webinars

[Tom Nichols]

This was discussed at the October 2020 PIPA Live webinar and is available as a recording.

[Tom Nichols]

This was discussed at the October 2020 PIPA Live webinar and is available as a recording.

[Tom Nichols]

This was discussed at the May 2021 PIPA Live webinar and is available as a recording.

[Tom Nichols]

This was discussed at the May 2021 PIPA Live webinar and is available as a recording.

• This reply was modified 1 year, 1 month ago by Tom Nichols.

[Tom Nichols]

This was discussed at the July 2020 PIPA Live webinar and is available as a recording. The below formed part of the discussion:

EU QPPV’s would require professional indemnity insurance as they are personally responsible for the PV system.
There are some specialist insurers out there that offer this, check the January PIPELINE edition for one such company’s advertisement.
With regards to bringing in house the deputy EU QPPV role and remain with an out sourced EU QPPV; this is a well-trodden road. You will need to ensure that there is clear and documented communication, including back-up processes, absence cover etc. between the parties.

[Tom Nichols]

N/A

• This reply was modified 1 year, 1 month ago by Tom Nichols.

[Tom Nichols]

This question was discussed at the June 2021 PIPA Live webinar and is available as a recording.

[Tom Nichols]

This question was discussed at the June 2021 PIPA Live webinar and is available as a recording.

[Author]

Posts